Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Tree House Sculpture Completed
Because the interior house lights are difficult to appreciate in these daylight outdoor photos I also took some pictures at dusk.
I rather like my Tree House out in our garden, but it would never survive the weather and Maine elements. so I think I will have to make something that will survive outside. this would make Shellburne very glad, because she suggested as much.
August Meeting with Mentor Shellburne Thurber
Saturday,
August 18th, I met for the second time with my mentor
Shellburne. When I got out of my
car carrying a big box with leaves and sticks poking out of it she looked at me
strangely, and I thought, “Gee, she told me to make things, and now that I did
she’s looking at me like I’m a crazy person.” But once inside, with my little tree house sculpture out of
the box and lit up, Shellburne lit up.
She told me when she saw the box with a ‘plant’ sticking out of it she
thought, “Now why is Amy bringing me a rose bush?” She liked my little sculpture much more than the imagined
rose bush. We talked about
sculpture quite a bit; other ideas of mine, suggestions of hers, and other
artists I should look at. I showed
her pictures of my chair/window sculpture in progress, and some photos of mine
that have given me other ideas. I
told her about the copper house idea with the ‘rain’ inside, and told her I had
a recirculating pump on order. She
told me I should consider a sculpture with a real living plant within it. I said on the ride down I had just
thought of such an idea, based on this brick skeletal structure I had recently
photographed (see this week’s photos).
She told me I should look at the sculptures of Lucas Samaras and Louise
Bourgeois. She also suggested I
look at Felix Gonzalas, who art deals with impermanence, and Jim Hodges, who
has done a lot of curtains that look like memorials. She said my work all seems to be about dematerialization and
encroachment.
When she finally got to looking at my photographs she said there were a
number of very strong images. But
she wants me to work on being able to defend my use of color, because my color
is ‘wrong’ and purists wouldn’t accept it. I told her I didn’t want the color to be ‘real’, because I
felt the images should have a sense of the not-quit-real. She agreed, and said my color usage fit
the imagery, but she wants me to play around with the color saturation as an
exercise to for my color choice defense.
She also told me I should look again at William Eggleston.
Visit to Boston's Institute for Contemporary Art
After visiting with my mentor, Shellburne, on August 18th, I went to Boston’s Institute for
Contemporary Art. They had a
Josiah McElheny exhibit, of which I thought his “Three Screens for Looking at
Abstraction” were the most intriguing to me. I was attracted to the way he juxtaposed geometry with
reflections, two dimensions with three dimensions, and created a sense of
endless space. He did this by
projecting film footage “culled from the history of abstract film” and projected
it onto geometric constructions of stretched cloth and mirrors.
There was also an exhibit by the Brazilians, Os Gemeos (brothers Gustavo
& Otavio Pandolfo), who got their start as street graffiti artists. There were a number of large, colorful,
and playfully imaginative paintings that I enjoyed. But the most interesting piece was “Os Musicos” (The
Mucisians). This was set up in a
corner of the gallery, with a painted organ facing the corner. Hanging on the two opposing corner walls
where a large number of old stereo speakers, each painted as a different human
face with the speaker representing their open mouths. A few had video screens with black and white videos clips
running instead of speaker-mouths.
One box had a red police light flashing and rotating on top. The boxes formed quite an assemblage of
characters. I asked a museum employee
if the organ could be played, and she said a musician would be playing the
organ in 20 minutes. (It turned
out we were lucky – the organ was being played only one Saturday a month, and
this was one of the Saturdays.)
Marti Epstein, composition Professor at Berkley and the New England
Conservatory, played the organ for us.
And the result was wonderfully curious. Each key projected its sound from a different speaker, and
each speaker had a different ‘voice’.
Some were musical, like salsa or hip-hop. Some were spoken phrases or single words. The result was a sense of walking down
a very busy city street, and being engulfed by the cacophony of many different
people’s voices, cultures, and beings.
There were a number of sculptures at the ICA that I really liked. One of my favorites was “Hanging Fire”
by English artist Cornelia Parker.
This sculpture was composed of many pieces of significantly charred wood
strung on monofilament and suspended from the ceiling. The burnt wood was from the remains of
a building that was set alight by an arsonist. The way the sculpture was composed suggested a human
constructed fire, like a camp-fire, with and sparks flying out and high up into
the air. The other sculpture that
attracted my attention still haunts me.
This sculpture was made by the Columbian artist Doris Salcedo and
entitled “Atrabiliarios” (from the words ‘atra billis’ meaning ‘melancholy
associated with mourning’). This
sculpture was composed with drywall (recessed into the gallery wall),
cow-bladder, surgical thread, and actual shoes that belonged to women abducted
in Columbia. The shoes stood
on their toes, facing out, in recessed boxes in the wall. Cow-bladder was stretched over the
opening on the boxes, and sutured tightly to the wall with surgical
thread. The effect made my heart
break for these lost women, and felt as if they were trapped by physically
painful means, encased but still able to see through a dim veil of reality, and
lost in a timelessness as though buried or embalmed alive.
I was pleased that there were a number of photographs. I was glad to see a photography by
Philip-Lorca di Corcia, and Anne Collier’s “Open Book #3”. But the series that left me pondering
was Moyra Davey’s “The Whites of Your Eyes”. This was a composed by a series of chromogenic prints
of images taken at her home (stacks of books, dishes, a dog) set in a grid on
the wall without framing. Each one
of these images had been folded into six part, addressed with white labels,
stamped, and sent through the mail to gallery or museum curators. The images being from her everyday
mundane life made these seem like a series of visual letters. And in an age of e-mail, tweets, and Facebook
it made these letter-photographs all the more appealingly interesting.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Jerry Saltz lecture - Art and the World Today - 8/12/12
Sunday, August 12th, I went to a lecture given by
Jerry Saltz called Art and the World
Today, at the Center for Maine Contemporary Arts in Rockport Maine. It was an excellent and engaging talk. Here are some of the points I jotted down to remember.
Art is a form of knowledge that is about experience. Art is a content carrier. Art is about how to imbed thought into
material. Art is work, work, work. Style
is something that eventually picks the individual artist, not the other way
around. As an artist you need to ‘hear’
yourself ‘see’. And one can never see
too much. An artist can never really know what they’re creating
until they are done. Artists need to be willing to be wrong, to
dance naked in public. Art is not optional; it’s part of the cosmic force.
Artists need to
be seen, have their work witnessed, and have people tell them what they think. Forming opinions on art is a way to get to
know yourself, by understanding why you have the opinions that you do about
art. The moment you understand a work of
art it gets you.
The art world
loves to pretend it’s the undertaker: painting is dead, this style is dead,
etc.. But we humans are all making this
up as we go along. The whole world is
built on opinions, so artists need to be delusional. And you can never let rejection define your life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























